11,832 total views,  8 views today

According to the Oxford Dictionary Plagiarism is: “The practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own” In precise words, plagiarismis an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s artwork and lying approximately it in a while.


This is not an article but a request. For quite some time various news channel have been converting ideas presented in my articles into videos and documentaries.

I have decided, enough is enough. The latest is this YouTube News Channel (StratNewsGlobal) which has copied my complete idea in my article: ‘2025 END GAME – XI’S CHINA MIRRORING NAZI GERMANY’. PLEASE DO NOT WATCH THE VIDEO, BECAUSE HE GETS PUBLICITY FOR FREE.


HERE I REQUEST FELLOW BLOGGERS TO COME TO MY RESCUE. My Twitter handle is @InsightGL. I have tweeted against this outright stealing. Kindly RETWEET and give as much publicity as possible.

Warm Regards.

103 thoughts

  1. depends on you. if you want attribution for your works, you may contact them and ask for attribution. if not you may ask them to remove your contents.
    under the indian copyright act, you can also file a lawsuit and claim damages.
    there are various schools of thoughts regarding copyright infringement. some people don’t mind if others duplicating their content even without attribution as long as it spreads some good information, knowledge, ideas, etc.

      1. I shall check it out. However, once again the idea is not to profit from my articles publicity.

    1. Thank you so much, Atul. I don’t want any money or recognition, but the normal courtesy says that one at least asks another person before using the content. The channel is for-profit and not a charity so that is the issue. They have not responded to my Tweet, so the next step would be to send a mail.

      1. you are welcome, sir.
        quite understandable.
        I totally agree with you regarding that. as I said earlier, you have all right under the law to decide how and in what manner others can use your content, especially in the current scenario when the alleged copyright violator is a for-profit entity.
        yes, try contacting them and if they still do not respond, tell them the actions that you may take.
        though enforcement of copyright laws is not so robust in our country, the courts nonetheless readily grant at least injunctions if not full damages.
        warm regards 🙂

      2. Thanks, Atul, that’s really helpful. Let’s see how it goes. Warm regards.

    2. some people don’t mind if others duplicating their content even without attribution as long as it spreads some good information, knowledge, ideas, etc. So true through using the power of the www to share valuable info to people

      Sharing, supporting, informing, enlightening, entertaining (??), impacting, encouraging, empowering, enriching, challenging, igniting, uplifting (and perhaps even) inspiring

      (enough there for now, c)


      1. Thank you so much for stopping by and sharing your wonderful thoughts. I also don’t mind, my thought being used and shared. I give it for free to various websites. However, when I asked this website that your video is based on my article word by word, they became aggressive. That was uncalled for.

      2. Quite understandable how you feel (I always try to recognise /attribute sources of info that am sharing) and you’re doing a great job helping spread the word and “batting” for India + the sub-continent… + the world, Commander
        enjoy the cricket IPL
        “Waking up sleepy-head” c

  2. News channel are all bloody sold out. They take things from you because you are much better than them. Indian media specially is all rags. All they can do is shouting and howling. It’s better you take a copyright. Needless to say, you can always challenge them further.

    1. Thank you so much, Akash. Earlier Zee TV copied my World War III series and made a program on it. Now this one.

      1. If you know some lawyer better consult him . If not you can tell me, I know many. Also as I said the electronic media is always short of things. If you see around today in any genre they only have is crap. To make things better and to upkeep their reputation, they do copy things. Also I’m pretty much sure, they must have thoroughly gone through your webpage before taking anything. So take the call 🙂🙂

      2. Yeah, I know a copyright lawyer, but the legal route would be my last choice. Thanks.

    1. I don’t stop anyone from taking my content. My only expectation was that they take my permission or at least acknowledge my work. I put in 15-20 days in each article’s research. So that’s what I find unfair.

      1. Sandeep, yes. It is unethical. I would not be surprised if the CIA stole your work as well. You will get the last laugh, because you are the source of the arrangement of the information. Plagiarists know they frauds deep insight—that affects them negatively in all their relationships. They know they are not worthy of love, honor, or respect. So actually you can pity the asses.

      2. I absolutely agree with you. I am not looking for anything in return from them, just norm decency.

  3. ◇ – Diamond Hard – ◇

    ◇ Possession is Poisoning Our Souls EveryOne; if YOU!!! ARE Serious about YOUR!!! Being Attached to YOUR!!! Stuff Get a Good Lawyer…some will work on a No Win No Fee Basis;or Even Better Pro Bono like Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

    ◇ – Diamond Hard – ◇


    1. Thank you so much, Yernasia. I am not really attached to my article, but people are forgetting the basic decency of asking. I am not here for any money-making or profiteering, but that YouTube channel is.

  4. It’s sad, but that what the 2minutes noodles world believes in- prompt and quick results with least or no efforts! You have been doing great writing, n will only add to your readership in the days to come. But do warn the plagiarist with dire consequences! Sorry, I am not on Twitter.

  5. Sandomina, you may re-post this on my blog if you like. Other than that, I do not know how else I can be of service in this matter. As I mentioned previously, I don’t have (or want) a Twitter account.

    1. No issues. We shall let it go. I have written to the News Channel. Waiting for their response.

  6. You should start a YouTube channel yourself! It’s wrong what the plagarisers have done, but if you vlog yourself you’ll beat them to it.

  7. Plagiarism begins from school level in India. The teachers plagiarise and so does even the Vice Chancellors of universities – many thesis submitted by so called luminaries are nothing but plagiarism. So are many books written – both in English and in Vernacular.

    It’s all because of the rot system of education and the parental pressure on children to achieve high marks – irrespective of methodology adopted. Many parents end up making models or even writing papers for their children and on top of it they brag about it.

    In Canadian schools, any submission by students are put through a Plagiarism-check software and any infringement will result in zero marks and academic penalty too.

    Proper citation are needed – that too from trusted sites only – even at middle school level.

    Copyright laws too are archaic and the Indian courts do not dispose off them that easily.

    All these result in Plagiarism being seen as ‘not a crime’ in Indian eyes.

    1. Thank you so much, Reji. It is so heartening to see help pouring in from all blogger friends.

  8. I am sorry this happens so much. It is disingenuous of somebody to claim to have written something they have not, whether explicitly or implicitly, by omitting proper credit.

    I have made my own blog writing open-source, because I would rather not be disappointed in somebody stealing “my” ideas and words. I have no idea where words come from, but I only feel partial ownership to them when they do. The Internet is too big a place to expect to police.

    I hope you receive a good resolution to this, and fair treatment for your work and your right to control where your own words appear. It is a very porous world.

  9. Furious, here, at this shocking theft; praying it does not deter your crucial ongoing work. I am not in position though, to fulfill your most reasonable and urgent request. As an aged Luddite, so cast, by seeing super-rich empowered entities censure against my interest, while hoovering up my valuable data, I hold only a narrow family window on FB, with no other social media presence. I see now, my stance is ineffective.

  10. Sandeep, if I were on twitter I would totally retweet this. I learn SO much from you and I am angered that people are stealing your thoughts! I hate and despise plagiarism. Keep pressing on, brother! We need your wisdom and insight!

    1. Hey Cherie. Finally, that media house reached out to me. Though they still refuted my claim I was sent feelers through some common friends that they want a compromise. I was not interested in any legal route. They like my writing and asked me to write for them. So let us see. Thank you so much for your tacit support. I was so overwhelmed.

      1. You’re very welcome! And wow! I’m so glad this got you a job with them! This is definitely a blessing! Wishing you all the best in your new writing gig! 🙂

      2. Hehe… Thanks, Cherie, this is not a job. I am already full time employed, but yes it gives me a chance to reach out to a big reader’s pool.

      3. Strategic writing is my passion. I put in 15-20 working days to complete each article. If I get a larger readership, it would justify my hard work. Thank you so much, Cherie, for being so kind.

  11. Plagiarism is a rampant phenomena in the field of intellectual property. We daily come across news of music directors copying the tunes.
    In older times when social media wasn’t available to wider public, such thefts got rarely noticed.
    We the present generation are not Adam and Eve. Humans have evolved making use of the collective knowledge of previous generations. It is OK.
    But the lifting of other’s idea in toto without consent is a crime. Taking the other’s idea for reference by duly informing the owner is OK i think.

    1. Thank you so much for your tacit support. I have no issues with people using my articles. There are 15 websites that use my articles regularly, and 5 of them are proper news websites. I give it to them for free. One has to just ask for it. Anyways after raising the matter on Twitter, almost 20K people came out in my support, and finally, they sent a mail to me. The matter was resolved with the news channel, amicably.

  12. There is no theft worse than stealing someone’s ideas or imagination. You would have invested a lot of time and energy in creating your content. You deserve the credit for those. Hope you get justice.

  13. Great minds create ideas…petty minds label it as there own…Keep churning the ideas.. even if others jump to stick their labels on to it….

  14. Thank you for stopping by and reading. I read this and it made me sad. If this is the case (and I know plagiarism certainly happens) I certainly feel for you. All people need to do is ask or give proper credit. I hope it no longer occurs to you.

  15. I had my article on ‘pakistan and terrorism’ plagiarized by a TV channel. At that time i was shocked and confused…however, you just confirmed my hunch. The media houses have people who scout the blogs for material.

    1. Yes. This is not the first instance. Before this also Zee and other TV channels turned my WW III article into their documentary. Thanks for stopping by, Jyotirmay.

  16. It was Zee in my case. I thought about not taking a name..but then…. Yeah so a certain Mr Chaudhary was given the material gleaned from a certain wordpress blog. XD
    These mediawalahs are certainly not in the habit of citing the works. Somehow we do not take the western idea of plagiarism too seriously, it seems. Its like the communist version of knowledge generation….only the “state” owns it and not the individual! You should claim your copyright and also cite the blog on their twitter.

    1. I know but Indian laws against plagiarism are hollow. Don’t have that much time to start chasing ppl. Some ppl said to take it as a compliment and move on.

      1. Just keep yourself active on social media platforms and let the general public know. I understand that at this moment its more important to have good ideas spread to non blog readers aka aam janata…so all is well. I am reading your Friedmann and China article. You forgot Morrison Garages(MG motors) in UK takeover by the Chinese…they are selling in India a certain SUV called Hector. 🙂

      2. Thanks, Jyotirmay. I am aware of MG motors acquisition, however, that is a very old case. What I had mentioned here are some(not all) of the latest cases. Let us enjoy writing for now. I was not existing on any social media platform. I joined Twitter for this reason only, and I got tremendous support from the community.

  17. It’s totally unethical. Such thefts need to be displayed on social media for naming and shaming these copycats.

    1. Thank you so much for your support. The publisher was named and shamed on Twitter. This is not the first instance of such plagiarism. Electronic media regularly converts articles into the documentaries without permission.

  18. 管党治党不力 不敢揪住老问题 严重失职失责 没有紧盯组织部“官油子”新动向
    2019年8月6日和同年12月10日上午老河口市政府截访人张杰明确告知,中央政法委机关党建,明显存在“灯下黑”、怕躲推、虚飘浮、“打伞破网”欺软怕硬、监督执纪问责走过场和党建与业务“两张皮”问题。全国扫黑办明知省法院司法败类是身残志坚,双目失明了还坚持睁着眼睛说“专门鉴定属实”的瞎话的道德低下的“货色”,故意拍卖良知,亵渎公职人员的身份。省法院司法败类玩忽职守,不认真落实上级要求、若不是眼瞎就是心坏,明知公安通过侦查获知目击证人陈国英已指认杨元庆故意毁灭0087048号发票证据,为干扰、误导、阻挠案件调查,向上级汇报时隐瞒重要证据和线索触犯了众怒,导致该案长期未能侦破,否则不会胆大妄为说出这样颠倒黑白,捏造事实的话来的。可见,省法院司法败类不仅没有任何的道歉意思,还来继续挑战底线……实现正义不是自说自话, “如果捏造的‘专门鉴定属实’鉴定结论报告对省高院司法败类有利,省高院司法败类怎会不公开?不公开法律文书文号说明了啥?明明我们老河口市信访局相关领导揪住了老河口市法院极个别司法败类故意协助他人故意隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”证据等“问题案件”的狐狸尾巴!揪住了湖北省高院鄂法(83)刑二申字第24号《通知》中司法败类尽情自嗨不惜虚构鉴定事实,只敢捏造“专门鉴定属实”的所谓鉴定结论糊弄官僚政客,毕竟心虚胆寒不敢更进一步捏造该鉴定结论法律文书的文号的狐狸尾巴!媒体记者、尊敬的中央办公厅丁薛祥主任、尊敬的中央办公厅陈世炬主任、省国保总队和襄阳国保支队相关人员都诘问人面兽心的湖北省高级法院一小撮人模狗样的司法败类:“谁能拿人格保证涉案‘0087048号原始发票’现身后经鉴定不是卖砖人所开的”?!真当省委超良书记、省纪委立山书记、瑞连部长、襄阳市委乐成书记、市长郄英才、纪委义斌书记和胡勇部长是白痴吗?做贼心虚拒绝回答、拒绝公开羞辱了谁?无论一九七九年的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四条还是二零一八年《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第五十四条都规定“凡是伪造证据、隐匿证据或者毁灭证据的,无论属于何方,必须受法律追究。”这里故意隐匿或者毁灭0087048号发票证据的,究竟“属于何方”?省法院司法败类心知肚明!“必须受法律追究”,有商量、讨价还价的余地吗?!彻底把案件搅浑的湖北省高级法院一小撮司法败类在以鄂法(83)刑二申字第24号“半夜鸡叫”式“坑官”的通知、老河口市委、政府等人依旧保持着对司法败类马首是瞻的一贯嘴脸故意糊弄中共中央办公厅的“半夜鸡叫”式的报告,这有何深意?难道不是在刻意淡化乃至逃避网友关注的嫌疑吗?正告湖北省高级法院极个别人模狗样的司法败类不要玩火,隐蔽性再强,终会露出破绽;幌子再好,也躲不过纪法的严查。很可惜,中央办公厅副主任、前国家主席办公室主任陈世炬兼国家主席办公室主任期间,责任意识不强、工作作风漂浮,停留于“轮流圈阅”“层层转发”、以文件落实文件,没有一锤锤持续用力敲下去让坏人钻了空子。尊敬的世炬主任、尊敬的薛祥主任现在知道老河口市委、政府等人依旧保持着对法院司法败类马首是瞻的一贯嘴脸故意糊弄中共中央办公厅的丑行后,让襄阳市委书记李乐成、市长郄英才、政法委书记冯艳飞、组织部部长胡勇和纪委书记吕义斌重新向中共中央办公厅报告或把关过目,肯定会将“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票及其鉴定结论等事实真相”大白于天下。毕竟,只要媒体记者一戳到官德与其外表不匹配的湖北省高级法院司法败类“虚构鉴定事实,捏造‘专门鉴定属实’的鉴定结论”这个“死穴”,他就人格扭曲,公然粉饰和包庇故意隐匿或者毁灭0087048号发票证据的不法行为甚至顾左右而言他,这种双标的行为让人不耻!如果幻想指望由擅长制造冤假错案的司法败类来平反冤假错案,那就等于请狐狸来看守鸡窝,简直太荒谬了。故意谎报情况,隐藏、遮掩问题背后有啥猫腻?”法不可欺。“有黑必有伞,有伞必有网”,为使每一起案件都经得起法律衡量,中央政法委应大胆触及到省法院司法败类的逆鳞,迅速敲定“时间表”、厘清“责任人”,加大查处力度, 稳住高压态势、稳住惩治力度、持续精准发力,提级处置及时牵头中央纪检监察机关会同检察机关、公安机关,穷尽式调查获取关键线索并深挖彻查湖北省法院“帮助故意隐匿或毁灭‘据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票’证据的犯罪分子逃避法律处罚案”背后的“保护伞”“关系网”!
    2019年10月30日上午襄阳市委组织部胡姓工作人员明确告知,德不配位的袁乃义好日子到头了!我们襄阳市委组织部要求老河口组织部乃义部长按干部管理权限、依法逐级走访和依法分类处理信访诉求工作规则、若你的“级别认定”诉求既有事实依据又有政策法律依据应予以支持,及时确定你的“级别认定”信访诉求究竟是“副科”?还是“正科”?!若不支持你的“级别认定”诉求即不能“认定级别”,阐明究竟是属于缺乏事实依据,还是缺乏法律、政策依据,还是既缺乏事实依据又缺乏法律、政策依据这三种情况之中的哪一种?出具《“级别认定”信访事项处理意见书》即可,如此简单的问题,可外表嚣张经常牵着老河口市委书记张学林、市长王燮耀、政法委书记王岩和纪委书记黄光强鼻子走、德不配位、内里虚弱的袁乃义这个“搅屎棍”本应低调一些,却偏要喜欢“没事找事”作死、刷存在感而违反常识和鄂信发〔2017〕26号文件规定的格式和要素,公开顶风违纪违法、推诿扯皮就不履行“认定级别”职责、拒绝向信访人出具《“级别认定”信访事项调查处理意见书》故意闹事惹人注目,乃义部长擅权妄为严重破坏了襄阳的政治生态“作死”到人尽皆知,报告给我们襄阳市委组织部的材料,根本曝不得光,经不住查,我们襄阳市委组织部胡勇部长再三暗示任何人包括云媒体记者不得提有关召开市级公开听证会的事宜!老河口、襄阳“东厂”锦衣卫与我们组织部是通的,毕竟组织部有考核他们领导的权力。我们当即指出乃义部长的错误认识,老河口、襄阳纪委监委怎么能类比成明朝“东厂”锦衣卫?!况且,2019年5月22日,襄阳市纪委义斌书记在老河口强调:要对巡视巡查移交的问题,及时整改到位,迅速抓好落实。同年同月28日老河口市委学林书记强调:要学会换位思考,对群众反映的正常诉求,能尽快解决的要尽快解决和及时兑现……绝不能含糊其辞,更不能推诿扯皮。坚信老河口、襄阳纪委监委在处理检举控告,纪检监察机关及其工作人员不会私自留存涉及纪律审查方面的资料;不至于纪法意识淡漠,毫无敬畏之心“上下一般粗”任性地答复为“您反映问题的电子邮件本网站已收到”后管党治党不力,严重失职失责长期不“反馈”处理结果!更离谱的是,国信局给出《信访工作责任制实施办法》追责问责典型案例剖析(二)、(五)等指导意见;省纪委“一案三反馈” (即对信访举报及时进行受理反馈、办理反馈和结果反馈)破解信访梗阻深得民心。针对老河口市委组织部袁乃义、省高院司法败类的拙劣表演充分暴露出其不可告人的险恶用心和故意破坏湖北政治生态的政治企图。如若老河口、襄阳纪委监委仍有人侵犯群众知情权,“热衷于站队进圈”,大搞“政治攀附”丢弃、隐匿信访材料损害群众利益而不能幡然醒悟,势必玩火自焚!鉴于老河口市委组织部袁乃义不依法依规出具《“级别认定”信访事项调查处理意见书》并订立攻守同盟;公然采用“萝卜招聘”手段,违反组织人事纪律,将女儿袁杨招聘到老河口市财政局工作一事被举报后怀恨在心,办理信访事项推诿、敷衍、拖延、渎职、失职,弄虚作假,打击报复信访人并拒绝进行市级公开听证,公然对抗组织审查。故对与信访事项有直接利害关系的袁乃义提出回避请求,再次依法申请襄阳市委组织部和国保支队公开听证。
    我们襄阳市委组织部和国保支队要感谢陈国英的诚实和勇敢!反映问题被当捅娄子的目击证人陈国英到底动了谁的奶酪?时任省纪委书记宋育英敏锐地发现:擅长随意拿捏“勾兑”的省高院司法败类虚构鉴定事实,捏造“专门鉴定属实”的鉴定结论的司马昭之心,遮不了世人的眼睛!也彻底把案件搅浑的湖北省高级法院一小撮司法败类在以鄂法(83)刑二申字第24号“半夜鸡叫”式“坑官”的通知是如何出炉的?这有何深意?喜欢带节奏的省高院司法败类缺乏政治站位一边为故意隐匿或毁灭0087048号原始发票的犯罪分子撑腰打气打掩护,一边歪曲事实制造对立的“湖北省高级法院一小撮司法败类合伙故意帮助故意隐匿或毁灭0087048号原始发票的犯罪分子逃避法律处罚”案。所以这里面就有个疑问,因此把这个“专门鉴定属实”的讯息放出来,可能就是为了抵销公安和检察院紧盯“故意隐匿或毁灭0087048号发票证据”这个目标。罔顾事实真相,执意给“故意隐匿或毁灭0087048号发票证据”的犯罪分子撑腰打气一颗定心丸。以便给“故意隐匿或毁灭0087048号发票证据”案系上死结。果不其然,拥有省高院司法败类“官方背书”后,犯罪嫌疑人杨元庆也不承认故意毁灭0087048号原始发票证据的事实,以“因工作不慎遗失发票一张”来搪塞是必然的,也是高调的!喜欢带节奏的省高院司法败类“虚构鉴定事实、捏造鉴定结论”事件,为何会假得如此低级和离谱呢?而湖北媒体、公安、检察机关和纪检监察部门,又为啥连这么一个最基本的问题,都没看出来呢?带着疑问,省纪委育英书记对指认杨元庆故意毁灭0087048号发票证据的目击证人陈国英进行了调查取证。魔幻的是,襄阳公安和检察院不愿意拓宽问题线索来源渠道却采用了最糟糕的方式。当面对举报的不同意见时,率先想的是为冤假错案“捂盖子”,把问题扼杀在萌芽之中故意不去调查犯罪嫌疑人杨元庆,反而围着陈国英为何捅“专门鉴定属实”马蜂窝反复调查,致使证人陈国英很快死亡、线索及时掐断,让人费解,但捏造“专门鉴定属实”的鉴定结论特别是鉴定法律文书文号依然是“不能说的秘密”。然而,襄阳公安和检察院相关人员可能没有想过,盖子即便捂上了,问题还是没有解决。毕竟,解决问题是关键,何必去解决提出问题的人?!而且万一没捂好,就会像目前一样,把自己架在舆情的大火上烤。建议湖北三级法院方陪同杨元庆前去公安机关配合投诉调查,并恳请嫌疑人杨元庆、省高院扬言“专门鉴定属实”的事主和其他能提供资料的人提供证据,《刑事诉讼法》第六十条规定:“凡是知道案件情况的人,都有作证的义务。”提供真实的证词,是公民的义务。尽快让警方寻找出真相,况且,襄阳警方表示,将以非常认真和高敏感性的态度处理故意隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”案,公平公正调查后向媒体和公众公开核查结果!可惜的是,老河口公安“此事非公安事由,公安机关不予受理”在公通字【2017】6号文件第四十三条规定下的抹案企图终究没能如愿却大有玄机!假如紧盯不放、不破不休的襄阳警方从来没有放弃,此案在继续侦办中且经公安、检察机关前期侦查及近期补充侦查,涉事地点明确,涉事人物清晰,为何迟迟调查不清楚?这么长时间,是在调查事件,还是谋划公关对策?省委超良书记、瑞连部长、襄阳市委乐成书记和胡勇部长都知道:冤案始作俑者杨元庆当时的作案手法与省高院司法败类虚构鉴定事实,捏造“专门鉴定属实”的鉴定结论却不拿出“专门鉴定属实”法律文书的此案极其相似。公众在追问,有关部门不能不察。省高院司法败类必须回答:“那你有没有‘专门鉴定属实’法律文书?还是将其甩锅给警察毁灭了你的‘专门鉴定属实’法律文书?”还是警察愿意冒着极大的法律和舆论风险指导你毁灭了你的“专门鉴定属实”法律文书?回首《毛泽东年谱》第四卷第78页有关毛泽东同时任湖北省委第一书记王任重谈话。毛泽东说:“不向我反映情况,我才最累。你把湖北的真实情况告诉我,我就不累了。”巧合的是,中共中央办公厅作为中央的综合部门,是重要政治机关不愿意两次掉进了同一条河流陷入“政令出不了中南海”的怪圈。深感:司法是人心的风向标,怎么判就会导致怎么干,被省高院司法败类吹上天的“专门鉴定属实”水到底有多深?公安、检察、法院和纪委不会不知。知而不弃,这其中道理何在呢?为何“顶风而上”有错不改背后到底是什么原因?“省高院‘虚构鉴定事实,捏造鉴定结论’的水”有多深,其实并不是最难的问题,更要追问管理者有没有尽到应有的担当。湖北省高院“专门鉴定属实”后据以定罪量刑的0087048号原始发票丢失、扬言“专门鉴定属实”的鉴定结论的法律文书丢失,法律文书及文号成了一场“乌龙”等问题既然已经发生,及时纠正和治理才是迫在眉睫的事。“省高院‘虚构鉴定事实,捏造鉴定结论’是表象,不讲政治是根本。”所以,将日理万机的时任国家主席的胡锦涛收到你父亲的《刑事申诉状》和《举报信》后,在考察途中由中共中央办公厅从江西发函到老河口市政府并要求报告调查处理结果。更离谱的是,当时任老河口市委常委相关人员领导不力,政治站位不高缺乏政治担当和斗争精神,不敢动真碰硬,姑息纵容,政治意识、法治意识严重缺失、责任意识淡薄咬紧牙关就是不提0087048发票究竟是故意隐匿还是故意毁灭?政府相关人员“搔不着痒处”对党中央决策部署理解不深不透,中央办公厅的明确要求选择性执行,对党不忠诚、不老实毫无大局观念,本应对蓄意预谋隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”证据,主观恶性极深的事件彻查后如实上报中央办公厅,却违背我们党的宗旨,更严重影响党的形象,损害群众对党的信任与拥护故意以“徐祥生,‘查无此人’”代替对案件事实真相调查核实进行搪塞!结果是乱了规则,也寒了人心,给中央办公厅和中央纪委都上了一课。坏人不可怕,因为法网恢恢疏而不漏;恶人不可怕,因为天理昭昭正义必胜;但知法懂法不守法、有反侦察能力、身披“合法外衣”的黑恶势力之徒真的可怕,他会穷尽一切手段,动用一切关系,经常纠集他人,有预谋、有组织、有章法的实施违法犯罪活动,既难预防,也难一网打尽。省国保总队和襄阳国保支队就发现了更为棘手的问题:故意隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票” 甚嚣尘上舆情沸腾得像一口烧滚了的油锅。正当湖北省高院极个别司法败类莫不以为非作歹、以搞司法“勾兑”为能事最后鼓包露馅被揭穿后而坐立不安时,省高院有些人果然坐不住了。2019年7月31日省法院党组书记、院长游劝荣表态,千万不要低估全省法院系统工作和干部队伍中存在的突出问题及其严重性,千万不要低估从严治党……为这口油锅扔进了一粒火星。但事实却一次次证明,搞“帮助故意隐匿或毁灭‘据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票’证据的犯罪分子逃避法律处罚案”是条不折不扣的不归路。殊不知,自作孽不可活,天网恢恢疏而不漏,等待这些司法败类的必将是法律之剑。果然该来的,始终还是来了。今后我们再也不做“忍者神龟”,再也不做“沉默的羔羊”的尊敬的湖北省高级法院院长游劝荣2019年7月22日强调要做到“六个追问”:一是出了什么问题?危害是什么?二是谁干的?还有谁参与?谁为主,谁为次?三是这个错误和问题纠正了没有?什么时候纠正的?如何纠正的?四是追责了没有?五是反思了没有?总结了教训没有?六是亡羊补牢了没有?建立完善了制度没有?全省法院要按照“六个追问”的要求,从严整治,严肃追责,以铁的纪律打造过硬审判队伍,为司法公正提供组织和纪律保障。游院长是在指极个别司法败类故意协助他人故意隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”证据等“问题案件”吗?!还是指其它严重违反职业操守和类似套路手段的操作影响了司法的权威和司法的公信力的案件?光明从来无惧黑暗,正义必将压倒邪恶,法律定要严惩罪行。无论是蓄意预谋隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”证据的参与者还是幕后的策划者、组织者和指挥者,审判就将来到。不让人省心的湖北省法院的沦陷却无人敢查,不仅是对其涉嫌犯罪活动的纵容和鼓励,更是对法制的亵渎和愚弄。谁之过?
    为干扰侦查视线而虚构鉴定事实,捏造“专门鉴定属实”的鉴定结论,显然只是湖北省高院的一家之言,为干扰、误导、阻挠案件调查所进行的司法“勾兑”东窗事发只是时间问题。纵然有些冤案沉积了很久,可即使黑夜再长,终有日出的时刻,而司法败类等作恶分子即使一时得逞,最终的结果仍然是无底深渊。湖北省高院司法败类破坏党内政治生态、滥用职权、玩忽职守帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚的“虚构鉴定事实、捏造鉴定结论”案件的存在对于最高法、最高检来说简直是一个噩梦!因为,所谓天知地知你知我知的勾兑模式,有几个经得起举报、查处、交代、再查处的深挖模式。况且,无论是陈年旧案还是新发案件,无论涉及什么“保护伞”“关系网”,都将查深查透、依纪依法严肃公正处理。“全面从严治党”可不是说着玩的!面对铁的事实,省政法委、省高院一些人的脸会火辣辣吗?是否有愧怍之意?又能否诚恳认错?对类似襄阳揭不开“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票及其鉴定结论”等事实真相“盖子”的反常现象,上级纪委监委要亲自过问,依法采取挂牌督办、提级办理、异地用警、异地羁押等措施、公安、纪检监察“双专班”侦查模式,落实提前介入、同步立案、联合办案、信息反馈等措施,提高办案质效。毕竟,立案侦查是刑事诉讼的起点,也是走向公正的起点。案件之后走向,取决于证据收集情况和司法机关认定。案件何时在正确的路上,中外媒体记者,以及全社会都再耐心等待。然而,省国保总队和襄阳国保支队相关人员缺乏政治敏锐性,在思想上缺了钙、丢了魂未及时将此重要信息向上级部门或领导报告,故意对上敷衍、对下冷漠、对事拖沓,故意不依法履行职责,核查“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票及其鉴定结论”等事实真相后及时“召开听证会公开核查结果”没人提了、如此,大家只能继续猜测:这里面还有猛料啊,究竟是不搭理公众的质疑,还是有什么难言之隐?呼唤公正尽快到来及时彻查司法败类帮助故意隐匿或毁灭“据以定罪量刑的涉案的0087048号原始发票”证据的犯罪分子逃避法律处罚案!竟然没有人继续关心该谁立案了——谁自家吃苍蝇见鬼谁知道! 此致 中央纪委、中央组织部、各省、市、自治区纪委、国家信访局、中共湖北省委组织部
    湖北省老河口职业技术学校首任武装部长:徐学军 手机:13986348626 邮编:441805
    二零一九年十二月二十五日 附件一:2001年老河口市武装部的【2001】河武字第20号《任职命令》;
    支持xuxuejun333持續分享原創文章/Support xuxuejun333 keep writing

    感謝您閱讀完本文,点滴意念,已汇成滔滔江河,无声之处,终将惊雷滚滚。希望本文能夠給您帶來不同的觀點,如果覺得本文對您有幫助,歡迎點讚、分享、或者留下您的想法交流討論,也歡迎小額捐款幫助我持續寫作原創內容,給予作者鼓勵,謝謝!谁也不能预知未来,但是我们每一天都在构建未来;谁也不能回到过去,但是现在的每一天都是从过去而来。时局如戏,我们既是观众,又是演员;既是编剧,又是影评。世间缤纷,初心不变。 Thank you for reading this article, share/like/comment is always welcome. If you feel useful please donate small amount to help me keep writing original content, many thanks! $18.00;90 €


    1.湖北中国银行账号:621 661 7603 0006 17516 收款人:徐学军(xu xuejun)



Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.